Updated deps & benchmarks

README.md

@@ -212,10 +212,10 @@ Selected samples: (1 of 27)
  > spec
 
 Sample: spec.txt (110610 bytes)
- > commonmark-reference x 60.70 ops/sec ±7.76% (61 runs sampled)
+ > commonmark-reference x 68.63 ops/sec ±6.53% (72 runs sampled)
- > current x 80.00 ops/sec ±2.03% (68 runs sampled)
+ > current x 79.62 ops/sec ±3.22% (80 runs sampled)
- > current-commonmark x 103 ops/sec ±0.72% (76 runs sampled)
+ > current-commonmark x 103 ops/sec ±1.10% (76 runs sampled)
- > marked-0.3.2 x 22.65 ops/sec ±3.07% (41 runs sampled)
+ > marked-0.3.2 x 23.14 ops/sec ±1.66% (42 runs sampled)
 ```
 
 As you can see, `markdown-it` doesn't pay with speed for it's flexibility.

benchmark/implementations/commonmark-reference/index.js

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 'use strict';
 
 var commonmark = require('commonmark');
-var parser = new commonmark.DocParser();
+var parser = new commonmark.Parser();
 var renderer = new commonmark.HtmlRenderer();
 
 exports.run = function(data) {

package.json

@@ -28,16 +28,16 @@
   },
   "devDependencies": {
     "ansi": "~0.3.0",
-    "autoprefixer-stylus": "~0.4.0",
+    "autoprefixer-stylus": "~0.5.0",
     "benchmark": "~1.0.0",
     "browserify": "*",
     "chai": "~1.10.0",
-    "commonmark": "~ 0.16.0",
+    "commonmark": "~ 0.17.1",
     "coveralls": "~2.11.2",
-    "eslint": "0.11.0",
+    "eslint": "0.13.0",
     "eslint-plugin-nodeca": "^1.0.0",
     "istanbul": "*",
-    "jade": "~1.8.2",
+    "jade": "~1.9.2",
     "markdown-it-abbr": "~ 0.1.0",
     "markdown-it-deflist": "~ 0.1.0",
     "markdown-it-emoji": "~ 0.1.3",
@@ -48,8 +48,8 @@
     "markdown-it-sub": "~ 0.1.0",
     "markdown-it-sup": "~ 0.1.0",
     "markdown-it-testgen": "~ 0.1.3",
-    "marked": "0.3.2",
+    "marked": "0.3.3",
-    "stylus": "~0.49.3",
+    "stylus": "~0.50.0",
     "mocha": "*",
     "uglify-js": "*"
   }